Moderators Can Something Be Done To Control This Person?

[aliveandkicking]

Yes but you saaid on the other thread that you had worked for a bank.

I have no idea why you are blaming me for stuff you wrote.

I have never said i worked for a bank

Never. I said i had been working for a company in the city of london hoping to sell financial products to banks related to the ending of open outcry trading in the london stock exchange in preparation for big bang. I also commented i had sourced a number of different loans from banks after big bang that were not possible prior to big bang and your response to that was more or less 'you liar. you fraud'

You are out of control.

And you have been beating the crap out of me over this for weeks and you have not got the guts to apologise

You are a liar and a cheat.

You have no interest in what is true. Fraud and deceit are your nature

[loginandtonic]

all not just a bit of a misunderstanding between you two? shake e-hands and forget it because poster 'Injin' may just be confusing you with someone else, wrong end of the stick, easy to get confused on here with so many similar names, avatars, etc etc. no need for either of you to get upset.

[aliveandkicking]

all not just a bit of a misunderstanding between you two? shake e-hands and forget it because poster 'Injin' may just be confusing you with someone else, wrong end of the stick, easy to get confused on here with so many similar names, avatars, etc etc. no need for either of you to get upset.

There is no misunderstanding

This individual is a liar

[Kazuya]

Why not just put this said individual on ignore?

[24gray24]

This must be round 178 by now.

Who's winning?

[SNACR]

There is no misunderstanding

This individual is a liar

I've heard he says money doesn't exist.

[Kazuya]

This must be round 178 by now.

Who's winning?

Gary Glitter.

[Guest vicmac64]

Oh Grow up and realise that Injin contributes a lot to this site. I don't agree with him on many things but he always gives reasoned argument and robustly defends his views - perhaps that is your problem - he has opinions and sticks to them.

I don't like that word 'control' as a Libertarian I object to you trying to have Injin Blacklisted, but I will defend your right to say what you like.

By the way if its Injin or you? well so sorry......................... I'll back Injin any time.

I have never said i worked for a bank

Never. I said i had been working for a company in the city of london hoping to sell financial products to banks related to the ending of open outcry trading in the london stock exchange in preparation for big bang. I also commented i had sourced a number of different loans from banks after big bang that were not possible prior to big bang and your response to that was more or less 'you liar. you fraud'

You are out of control.

And you have been beating the crap out of me over this for weeks and you have not got the guts to apologise

You are a liar and a cheat.

You have no interest in what is true. Fraud and deceit are your nature

Edited April 29, 2009 by vicmac64

[Little Professor]

Don't you guys have like a 90 page thread where you indulge in your willy-waving? Can't you confine your whining to there?

EDIT: My mistake, it's 147 pages. Jebus, you guys are tragic.

Edited April 30, 2009 by Little Professor

[Timm]

Let's move this thread. In the meantime, and for balance:

http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/ind...t&p=1853757

FWIW, whilst I have often crossed swords with Injin, I have never found him to be other than scrupulously courteous, even when being robustly direct. I have never identified any lies he has told other than statements of his beliefs such as that anarchy is a good idea.

aliveandkicking has stated (in the thread we have both quoted) that he has provided services to banks and bankers. I can understand someone interpreting this as "working for a bank". All that was needed was a simple correction.

[ʎqɐqɹǝʞɐɥs]

I'll get the popcorn.

[Guest Steve Cook]

I have never said i worked for a bank

Never. I said i had been working for a company in the city of london hoping to sell financial products to banks related to the ending of open outcry trading in the london stock exchange in preparation for big bang. I also commented i had sourced a number of different loans from banks after big bang that were not possible prior to big bang and your response to that was more or less 'you liar. you fraud'

You are out of control.

And you have been beating the crap out of me over this for weeks and you have not got the guts to apologise

You are a liar and a cheat.

You have no interest in what is true. Fraud and deceit are your nature

Injin is an ideologically driven idiot and he is prone to use these pathetic rhetorical tactics. He used to piss me off as well because if there is one thing I can't stand it's intellectual dishonesty. However, just remember at all times that he is a blithering idiot and it will stop bothering you as much......

[tomwatkins]

I have never said i worked for a bank

Never. I said i had been working for a company in the city of london hoping to sell financial products to banks related to the ending of open outcry trading in the london stock exchange in preparation for big bang. I also commented i had sourced a number of different loans from banks after big bang that were not possible prior to big bang and your response to that was more or less 'you liar. you fraud'

You are out of control.

And you have been beating the crap out of me over this for weeks and you have not got the guts to apologise

You are a liar and a cheat.

You have no interest in what is true. Fraud and deceit are your nature

I know we had a little spat last night, on another thread, about assets and liabilities so we won't go there. What I can say is that I followed your reasoning on certain aspects of banking and thet made sense to me. Your arguments were clear and wether you are a banker or not is irrelevant so kudos to you. I just skip that Injin guy-my Dad would have summed him up best "one of the awkward squad". Don't know who they were exactly but seems pretty apt. Anyway concentrate on educating, supporting your arguments and forget about the nit-pickers. Injin has his supporters-I'm in your corner, not that it matters a w@nk.

[warpig]

This thread is spineless.

[Bardon]

say no to diversity

[Alan B'Stard MP]

Injin is an ideologically driven idiot and he is prone to use these pathetic rhetorical tactics. He used to piss me off as well because if there is one thing I can't stand it's intellectual dishonesty. However, just remember at all times that he is a blithering idiot and it will stop bothering you as much......

+1

The man is a fool.

Also has a huge vested interest.

[Kazuya]

+1

The man is a fool.

Also has a huge vested interest.

In beans and tin foil hats?

BTW, does he have aspergers?

[General Congreve]

In beans and tin foil hats?

BTW, does he have aspergers?

No idea, but his busty maid avatar makes my junk twitch, +1 for that.

[Alan B'Stard MP]

In beans and tin foil hats?

BTW, does he have aspergers?

His ego and identity are completely entwined with his ideology.

His casuistry over the banking issue is necessary to protect his sense of himself. Show him he his wrong and he cannot admit it.

Other observations:

1. He will not let anyone get the last word

2. He will not admit he is wrong - he just moves the goalposts.

His modus operandi is in fact quite infantile - which coupled with his squimishness over human violence suggests to me he has some emotional retardation - and therefore is not a completely rational person.

But thats just my opinion.

Edited April 30, 2009 by Alan B'Stard MP

[loginandtonic]

His ego and identity are completely entwined with his ideology.

His casuistry over the banking issue is necessary to protect his sense of himself. Show him he his wrong and he cannot admit it.

Other observations:

1. He will not let anyone get the last word

2. He will not admit he is wrong - he just moves the goalposts.

His modus operandi is in fact quite infantile - which coupled with his squimishness over human violence suggests to me he has some emotional retardation - and therefore is not a completely rational person.

But thats just my opinion.

casuistry ...a word i'd never heard of before, had to look it up

but when you say he is squeamish about violence, please elucidate, since i see nothing wrong in anyone who's anti-violence

Edited April 30, 2009 by loginandtonic

[Alan B'Stard MP]

casuistry ...a word i'd never heard of before, had to look it up

but when you say he is squeamish about violence, please elucidate, since i see nothing wrong in anyone who's anti-violence

Nothing wrong with the viewpoint of anti-violence. But imagine the stray dog you take into your house - who you find quivering under the stairs the first time you raise your voice. The behaviour is not typical.

[loginandtonic]

Nothing wrong with the viewpoint of anti-violence. But imagine the stray dog you take into your house - who you find quivering under the stairs the first time you raise your voice. The behaviour is not typical.

that would of course suggest the dog had been shouted at and hit a lot in the past

did injin quiver at smething? i haven't read the thread, but maybe he/she has had an upsetting past and they are extra sensitive or whatever, we're all only human after all with respect: go on shake hands & move on, life's too short

[Guest Steve Cook]

In beans and tin foil hats?

BTW, does he have aspergers?

Highly like to be somewhere on that spectrum on my opinion

[Guest Steve Cook]

His ego and identity are completely entwined with his ideology.

His casuistry over the banking issue is necessary to protect his sense of himself. Show him he his wrong and he cannot admit it.

Other observations:

1. He will not let anyone get the last word

2. He will not admit he is wrong - he just moves the goalposts.

His modus operandi is in fact quite infantile - which coupled with his squimishness over human violence suggests to me he has some emotional retardation - and therefore is not a completely rational person.

But thats just my opinion.

Very astute observations. Ones I would pretty much agree with.

[24gray24]

I like both of 'em enough to buy them a drink.

Mr Alive has a tendency to explode with rage once every ten pages or so. But then arguing with M.Injin would do that to anyone...

It is however (and IMO) a sign of something wrong, in terms of argumentation, if you can go 140 pages and not get anywhere. Either someone is continually shifting ground, or someone is going round in circles.

But I haven't read the thread recently, so may be out of date.

Haven't personally seen any evidence of Bstard proving Injin wrong on any matter. Can you post a link?.