Turned Out Nice Again

The Bbc Propaganda Thread

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, InlikeFlynn said:

No.

At least thats not what I read in the article. It's perhaps a reflection of the company he keeps - Trump team was "incidentally monitored"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39358363

As I said on another thread it's not surprising given his penchant for hanging out with Russians...

Hilary Clinton was probably incidentally monitored too.

 

Here's a quote from the article (my bold)

"Post-election communications of Donald Trump's team were swept up in an "incidental collection" by intelligence agencies, a Republican lawmaker says.

House intelligence committee chairman Devin Nunes said individuals were named in "widely disseminated" reports, which he said was "totally inappropriate".

Mr Nunes said this did not back Mr Trump's claim Barack Obama had ordered Trump Tower wiretapped before the poll."

Given that Nunes is a Republican and supporter of Trump you can take him at his word on this. 

 

 

So no problem with the fact that they were in fact spying on the trump administration but just arguing semantics that it was Obama who had ordered it. (That's ignoring that the claims that the Russians helped sway the election has been rubbished) 

Stasi state is still AOK, all political point scoring, tomorrow is going to be fun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, InlikeFlynn said:

No.

At least thats not what I read in the article. It's perhaps a reflection of the company he keeps - Trump team was "incidentally monitored"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39358363

As I said on another thread it's not surprising given his penchant for hanging out with Russians...

Hilary Clinton was probably incidentally monitored too.

 

Here's a quote from the article (my bold)

"Post-election communications of Donald Trump's team were swept up in an "incidental collection" by intelligence agencies, a Republican lawmaker says.

House intelligence committee chairman Devin Nunes said individuals were named in "widely disseminated" reports, which he said was "totally inappropriate".

Mr Nunes said this did not back Mr Trump's claim Barack Obama had ordered Trump Tower wiretapped before the poll."

Given that Nunes is a Republican and supporter of Trump you can take him at his word on this. 

 

 

Still wiretapped, still enabled by the policies put in place by Obama, Bit of plausible deniability and obfuscation by opening up unlimited access to multiple agencies.

=

Concerted effort to put in place all the infrastructure to spy/leak on selected targets.

 

Obama pushed through these changes in rules, he is responsible, he is behind it, he put the rules in place to enable it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something to balance the propaganda:

From Paul Joseph Watson on Youtube, so perfectly mainstream and accessible to all.

 

 

Edited by Errol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hail the Tripod said:

Well, it almost works as a parody of itself.

This stuff bears out my theory that being a 'comedian' is actually just a form of 'lay preaching' for SJWs. 

I think this comment on the Youtube page sums it up:

'They have the sense of humor of people who are legal guardians of an autistic person. You don't want to piss them off, so you laugh at their non funny shit in exchange for dinner.'

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The BBC has a headline on their website today 'Britain goes a full day without coal' with a photo of two shirtless chaps working in a mine in the 1920s. It is a really odd article. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was listening to NPR (american public broadcaster) the other day, and thinking how pointless it was listening to a Democrat politician being interviwed, as he was just avoiding all the interviewers questions and making anti-trump comments instead, and it turned out that it wasn't a politician, it was NPR's own political analyst. Weird world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was listening to R4 this AM when they were discussing the security leaks by US intelligence agencies to the NYT. They decided that it was very useful intel to the terrorists and John Humphries remarked, with contempt in his voice 'this one's nothing to do with Trump then' to the intelligence analyst he was talking to (how disappointing for him eh). Normal usage was President Obama (or maybe Obama in a reverential tone) Angela Merkel, Teresa May, etc. and not in a contemptuous tone. 

They also managed to avoid saying 'Islam' when discussing the bombers motives.'Ideology' was used a couple of times instead, as in 'they want their ideology to dominate the world'.  This craven self censorship by the MSM has been pointed out Douglas Murray and others on several occasions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's happened again. The BBC's flagship show Strictly racist for the third Year in a row. Somebody please have a word with the judges, what's not to understand about positive discrimination.

 

http://www.ok.co.uk/tv/strictly-come-dancing/1190761/strictly-come-dancing-racism-racist-chizzy-akudolu-holby-city-judge-first-leave-strictly-voted-bbc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/06/2017 at 9:12 AM, DrMartinSanchez said:

_96326268_compocomp.jpg

Current top article on BBC news.

Corbyn has a cross (X) behind him.

Coincidence?

 

X = bad? The mark of the beast?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.