-
Posts
996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About moneyfornothing
-
Rank
Newbie
Recent Profile Visitors
1,820 profile views
-
The GE was very clear .. each party had a distinct Brexit policy and that is how policy has always been decided in this country. Any referenedum held at any time would have a similar number of people claiming it wass 'flawed' - usually this would be the losing side - the only flaw is that people in this country have forgotten how to lose gracefully and do not understand losers consent
-
Let me state another fact .. there is no democratic way of implementing any policy in this country except through the current FPTP system. A GE is the only currently available means for deciding any policy issue in this country. A referendum was found to be undeliverable because the current system isnt geared to delivering referendum results.
-
No, not at all. The standard Brexiteer response to any suggestion of a 2nd referendum is "how many", to which my answer is as many as necessary. If we need another two or three then so be it. I doubt that the country would have an appetite for an infinite number of referendums so will probably reach some sort of agreement in due course, but multiple referendums would be preferable to one faction dragging the majority of the people, screaming and kicking, in or out of the EU. I would like to hear the "clunking fist" of Brexit voters voting, along with whatever sound that Remainers make when they cast their votes. Ol Bruce Banner above and my prediction - 6 months on and deeply satisfying
-
Latest Comres polling concludes.. The majority of the British public (54%) agree that irrespective of whether or not they voted to leave the EU, the 2016 Referendum result should be respected. Half of the British public disagree (49%) that Brexit should be delayed for a further three months to 31 January 2020, whilst less than three in ten (29%) agree.